<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>unthunk &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.unthunk.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.unthunk.com</link>
	<description>headcheese and mukluks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:01:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>possessionlessness mofongo</title>
		<link>http://blog.unthunk.com/2010/05/12/possessionlessness-mofongo/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.unthunk.com/2010/05/12/possessionlessness-mofongo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 01:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.unthunk.com/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google recently updated its search results page, beefing up the left column and adding other features.  For a while now, search results have been returning the top two results for &#8220;Did you mean&#8230;&#8221; when searching for many combinations of obscure, &#8230; <a href="http://blog.unthunk.com/2010/05/12/possessionlessness-mofongo/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google recently <a href="http://thenextweb.com/google/2010/05/05/radical-design-coming-google-search-results-today/">updated its search results page</a>, beefing up the left column and adding other features.  For a while now, search results have been returning the top two results for &#8220;Did you mean&#8230;&#8221; when searching for many combinations of obscure, misspelled, and odd forms of words.  In the newest redesign, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stemming">unstemmed</a> results for the original search for these types of words are now listed below the &#8220;Did you mean..&#8221; results.  A nice touch as it gives a view of the unstemmed results without having to use the &#8216;+&#8217; operator.  Result counts have been changed, too, showing just a count of results and the time it took to run the query (i.e. About 839,000 results (0.37 seconds)).  Nice and simplified, But, it breaks Unthunk, so whacking is offline for now until I can update the code.</p>
<p>Update: Google&#8217;s move to using JavaScript to retrieve search results, while making Google much more robust and responsive, means Googlewhacking at Unthunk has been permanently retired.  If you&#8217;re feeling nostalgic, you can still view the thunklist and stats at <a href="http://whack.unthunk.com">http://whack.unthunk.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.unthunk.com/2010/05/12/possessionlessness-mofongo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Googlewhacking is dead. Long live Googlewhacking!</title>
		<link>http://blog.unthunk.com/2010/01/30/googlewhacking-is-dead-long-live-googlewhacking/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.unthunk.com/2010/01/30/googlewhacking-is-dead-long-live-googlewhacking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 04:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.unthunk.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in November, Google made some changes that effectively killed Googlewhacking at Googlewhack and Unthunk.  This past week I heard from a few old Googlewhacking friends lamenting the loss of this game.  Well, Googlewhacking lives again!  I&#8217;ve removed the definition &#8230; <a href="http://blog.unthunk.com/2010/01/30/googlewhacking-is-dead-long-live-googlewhacking/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in November, <a href="http://blog.unthunk.com/2009/12/08/its-dead-jim/">Google made some changes that effectively killed Googlewhacking</a> at Googlewhack and Unthunk.  This past week I heard from a few old Googlewhacking friends lamenting the loss of this game.  Well, Googlewhacking lives again!  I&#8217;ve removed the definition link checking from Unthunk after considering a few other approaches to Google&#8217;s changes.  Since you&#8217;ll never see definition links in non-idiom multiple word searches, it seemed fair to remove this restriction from the game.  This opens up the thunklist to just about any &#8220;word&#8221; you can think of, real or not, which could make for some interesting whacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.unthunk.com/2010/01/30/googlewhacking-is-dead-long-live-googlewhacking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I See What You Did There</title>
		<link>http://blog.unthunk.com/2010/01/27/i-see-what-you-did-there/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.unthunk.com/2010/01/27/i-see-what-you-did-there/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.unthunk.com/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So it occurred to me this afternoon after reading several  iPad jokes on Twitter and watching an old Mad Tv  iPad comedy sketch that Apple must have seen the this coming and named it&#8217;s tablet the iPad to cash in &#8230; <a href="http://blog.unthunk.com/2010/01/27/i-see-what-you-did-there/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it occurred to me this afternoon after reading several <a href="http://twitter.com/chiatar/status/8290573426"> iPad jokes</a> on Twitter and watching an old <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsjU0K8QPhs">Mad Tv  iPad comedy sketch</a> that Apple must have seen the this coming and named it&#8217;s tablet the iPad to cash in on the instantly memorable name via viral marketing of bad jokes, even if it runs the risk of brand dilution of the iPod:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Apple Tablet Development Team Member 1:</strong> &#8220;We need a good, catchy name for our tablet, something that will really get people talking.&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Apple Tablet Development Team Member 2:</strong> &#8220;Hmm, Apple plus tablet equals Applet?&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Apple Tablet Development Team Member 3:</strong> &#8220;But where&#8217;s the &#8216;i&#8217; in that?&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Apple Tablet Development Team Member 1:</strong> &#8220;iApplet? sound like an ointment for pink-eye.&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Apple Tablet Development Team Member 3:</strong> &#8220;Ha ha!&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Steve Jobs:</strong> &#8220;Lame. Why am I paying you guys again?&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Apple Tablet Development Team Member 1:</strong> &#8220;How about iReader?&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Steve Jobs: </strong>&#8220;That just channels Ralph Wiggum&#8217;s &#8216;Me fail English? That&#8217;s unpossible?&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Apple Tablet Development Team Member 2:</strong> snickering &#8220;Let&#8217;s call it the iPad&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Apple Tablet Development Team: </strong>laughing followed by awkward silence</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Steve Jobs: </strong>&#8220;Yes.&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Apple Tablet Development Team:</strong> Silence</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Apple Tablet Development Team Member 3:</strong> &#8220;Uh, but won&#8217;t people make jokes like you can only use it once a month?&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Steve Jobs:</strong> &#8220;Yes.&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Apple Tablet Development Team Member 1: </strong>&#8220;Or call it the iPon?&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Steve Jobs: </strong>&#8220;Yes.&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Apple Tablet Development Team Member 2: </strong>&#8220;iPad. Really?&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Steve Jobs: </strong>&#8220;Yes.&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Apple Tablet Development Team: </strong>confused silence</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Steve Jobs: </strong>&#8220;Don&#8217;t you people have marketing degrees?&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Apple Tablet Development Team:</strong> more confused silence</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Apple Tablet Development Team Member 1:</strong> &#8220;Uh, yes?&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Steve Jobs: </strong>silence</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Apple Tablet Development Team Member 1: </strong>coughs and clears throat</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Steve Jobs:</strong> &#8220;Exactly. It will be a viral hit.&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Apple Tablet Development Team: </strong>&#8220;Ooooooooh!&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Apple Tablet Development Team Member 2: </strong>&#8220;So, we&#8217;re naming it the iPad because of the viral marketing opportunity of using bad jokes to make it an instantly memorable name?&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Steve Jobs:</strong> &#8220;Yes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Looks like the joke&#8217;s on us. Well played, Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.unthunk.com/2010/01/27/i-see-what-you-did-there/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Dead, Jim</title>
		<link>http://blog.unthunk.com/2009/12/08/its-dead-jim/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.unthunk.com/2009/12/08/its-dead-jim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.unthunk.com/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got an email from long-time Googlewhacker Will H that dictionary links are no longer appearing in some Google search results.  Single words are linking in some instances but in combination they are not.  For example, a search for &#8230; <a href="http://blog.unthunk.com/2009/12/08/its-dead-jim/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got an email from long-time Googlewhacker Will H that dictionary links are no longer appearing in some Google search results.  Single words are linking in some instances but in combination they are not.  For example, a search for &#8220;kafkaesque&#8221; links to a definition but a search for &#8220;kafkaesque nightclubby&#8221; does not.</p>
<p>I checked over at <a href="http://www.googlewhack.com/tally.pl">Googlewhack </a>to see if Gary had any news on this.  According to Googlewhack &#8220;<em>Late 04 Nov 2009, Google stopped providing definition links for public searches under certain conditions. That effectively broke Whack &#8212; which could be fixed &#8212; but similar problems occur every few months, and often are corrected by Google.&#8221; </em>That&#8217;s the most recent update at Googlewhack, so it looks like it&#8217;s been broken since the beginning of November.</p>
<p>A quick Google search turned up <a href="http://www.econtentmag.com/Articles/News/News-Item/Real-Time-Capability,-Google-Dictionary-Highlight-Google-Search-Updates-60065.htm">an explanation</a>.  About the time Google rolled its new live search it also changed the way it links words to definitions so that only single words and idioms are linked to definitions.  Additionally, the dictionary links are now pointing to definition pages on Google instead of <a href="http://www.answers,com">answers.com</a>.  Since multiple search terms no longer link, unthunk (and presumably Googlewhack) cannot validate whacks by checking for links when checking that the pair of terms returns only one result.  Link checking could be removed altogether or moved in single word score checking, but the former would change the rules and the latter would require additional searches.  As it is now, single word searches to get the counts per word are not performed unless pair checking show both are linked and only one result.</p>
<p>So for now, it&#8217;s dead, Jim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.unthunk.com/2009/12/08/its-dead-jim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NC Amazon Associates Program is Dead</title>
		<link>http://blog.unthunk.com/2009/06/26/nc-amazon-associates-program-is-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.unthunk.com/2009/06/26/nc-amazon-associates-program-is-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lucas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.unthunk.com/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got an email this morning from the Amazon Associates Program that they are closing Amazon Associate accounts in NC due to pending legislation: We are writing from the Amazon Associates Program to notify you that your Associates account &#8230; <a href="http://blog.unthunk.com/2009/06/26/nc-amazon-associates-program-is-dead/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got an email this morning from the Amazon Associates Program that they are closing Amazon Associate accounts in NC due to <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/">pending legislation</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
We are writing from the Amazon Associates Program to notify you that your Associates account has been closed as of June 26, 2009. This is a direct result of the unconstitutional tax collection scheme expected to be passed any day now by the North Carolina state legislature (the General Assembly) and signed by the governor. As a result, we will no longer pay any referral fees for customers referred to Amazon.com or Endless.com after June 26. We were forced to take this unfortunate action in anticipation of actual enactment because of uncertainties surrounding the legislation’s effective date.</p>
<p>Please be assured that all qualifying referral fees earned prior to June 26, 2009 will be processed and paid in full in accordance with our regular referral fee schedule. Based on your account closure date of June 26, 2009, any final payments will be paid by September 1, 2009.</p>
<p>In the event that North Carolina repeals this tax collection scheme, we would certainly be happy to re-open our Associates program to North Carolina residents.</p>
<p>The North Carolina General Assembly’s website is http://www.ncleg.net/, and additional information may be obtained from the Performance Marketing Alliance at http://www.performancemarketingalliance.com/.</p>
<p>We have enjoyed working with you and other North Carolina-based participants in the Amazon Associates Program, and wish you all the best in your future.</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>The Amazon Associates Team
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.unthunk.com/2009/06/26/nc-amazon-associates-program-is-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s new?</title>
		<link>http://blog.unthunk.com/2008/12/19/whats-new/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.unthunk.com/2008/12/19/whats-new/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.unthunk.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve ditched the news page in favor of using a blog, yay!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve ditched the news page in favor of using a blog, yay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.unthunk.com/2008/12/19/whats-new/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

